Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414369›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Quantifying the repeated evolution of insect raptorial forelegs.

Hikaru Miyaji, Tadashi Shinohara, Akihiro Hirayama, Yasuoki Takami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hikaru MiyajiGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Tadashi ShinoharaGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Akihiro HirayamaHyogo Prefectural Institute of Technology, Suma, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Yasuoki TakamiGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. takami@people.kobe-u.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H04844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect raptorial forelegs, which function in prey capture, evolved independently in several lineages. The common function may lead to morphological similarity; however, few studies have examined the morphological evolution of raptorial forelegs across insect lineages. We quantified morphological evolution in insect raptorial forelegs and other body parts based on comparative analyses of their shape, as quantified by segmental dimensions, across six lineages. We characterized three aspects of the evolution of morphological similarity in a morphospace: (1) a shift in mean shape, (2) a reduction in shape variation, and (3) similarity in the direction of evolution. The foreleg and forebody shapes exhibited low-to-moderate similarity in the direction of evolution with respect to the gain of raptorial function; however, significant patterns were not detected for other characteristics. Thus, the evolution of insect raptorial forelegs was not parallel or convergent but involved morphological diversity among lineages, indicating a many-to-one mapping of shape to function. We detected correlated patterns of evolution between the foreleg and forebody, reflecting functional relationships possibly related to hunting and depth perception. Furthermore, the direction of evolution differed between terrestrial and aquatic habitats. This study provides novel insights into the evolutionary processes leading to functional and morphological similarities.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionExtremitiesInsectaAnimalsPhylogenyPredatory BehaviorConvergenceMany-to-one mappingMorphospaceParallelismPredator

Identifiers

PMID42414369
PMCPMC13341782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.