Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414357›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Censoring-adjusted tree-based policy learning for estimating dynamic treatment regimes with censored outcomes.

Animesh Kumar Paul, Russell Greiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Animesh Kumar PaulDepartment of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. animeshk@ualberta.ca.
Russell GreinerDepartment of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs) provide a systematic approach for making sequential treatment decisions that adapt to individual patient characteristics, particularly in clinical contexts where survival outcomes are of interest. We explore ways to learn effective DTRs, from observational data, using Censoring-Adjusted Tree-based Reinforcement Learning (CA-TReL) - a novel framework to address the complexities associated with censored data when estimating optimal DTRs. By enhancing traditional tree-based reinforcement learning methods with augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) and censoring-adjusted estimation, CA-TReL delivers robust and interpretable treatment strategies. Through extensive simulation studies and real-world validation using the SANAD epilepsy dataset, CA-TReL achieved statistically better performance relative to several state-of-the-art methods - including OWL, RWL, TBWL, ASCL, and DWsurv - across key metrics such as restricted mean survival time (RMST) and decision-making accuracy. This work represents a step forward in advancing personalized and data-driven treatment strategies across diverse healthcare settings.

Identifiers

PMID42414357
PMCPMC13638464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.