ArticleBDJ open2026
Decoding bone grafting preferences: a cross-sectional survey of patient perspectives and influence of treatment cost.
Article in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate patients' preferences for different bone graft materials and assess the influence of treatment cost on these preferences in the Pakistani population. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adult patients across three tertiary-care hospitals in Karachi. A validated bilingual questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics, initial graft preferences, reasons for refusal, and changes in preference after introducing treatment cost. Descriptive statistics were reported and data were analyzed using chi-square test, and Bowker's test of symmetry. A total of 101 participants were included. Autologous grafts, particularly those derived from intraoral sites, were the most preferred type, while xenografts showed the highest refusal rates. Pain and discomfort were the primary concerns associated with autologous grafts, fear of disease transmission influenced allograft refusal, and religious considerations were the dominant factor for xenograft rejection. No statistically significant association was found between demographic variables and graft preference (p value > 0.05). Furthermore, introduction of treatment cost did not result in a significant preference shift (p value = 0.42). Cultural and safety-related perceptions significantly influenced decision-making. Although cost was acknowledged as an important factor, it did not significantly affect preferences, highlighting the need for culturally sensitive and patient-centered counseling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.