ArticleDrug and alcohol review2026
'It Takes a Village': Sociocultural Insights From a Qualitative Study on Strategies for Member Engagement and Participation in SMART Recovery.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSMART (self-management and recovery training) recovery is a mutual-help group that supports and sustains recovery from addiction, including substance use. Meetings are moderated by trained facilitators who manage group dynamics and guide members through a 4-point program. Nonetheless, sociocultural factors can influence group processes, shaping facilitation style and delivery of SMART Recovery. Our study explored facilitation strategies used in Singapore to foster member engagement and retention.
methodsIn-depth qualitative interviews with 18 participants (14 members and four facilitators) were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsSix themes were generated: (i) collaborative decision-making to manage inherent hierarchical group dynamics; (ii) using member-driven topics to find commonality and discuss taboo issues; (iii) emphasising 'no right or wrong' alleviates fear of social disapproval and disrupting group harmony; (iv) navigating autonomy within an interdependent group context; (v) encouraging involvement in activities outside of SMART Recovery meetings to strengthen group cohesion; and (vi) aligning facilitation roles with local cultural expectations. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsFacilitation processes were embedded within broader cultural contexts emphasising interdependence, relational harmony and belonging, collective obligation and avoiding the loss of face. Strategies reflect facilitators' social adaptability, other-orientation and responsiveness to group dynamics. These promoted key processes such as cohesion, collective identity and ownership, leading to reflective engagement, active participation and retention. Our study reiterates that situating mutual-help groups within their sociocultural contexts, including the potential coexistence of independent and interdependent views of the self, is essential for understanding and promoting meaningful engagement and participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.