ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Improving opioid substitution therapy in the acute hospital setting: implementation of a best practice guideline.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed provision of opioid substitution therapy (OST) in acute hospitals contributes to patient distress, opioid withdrawal and discharge against medical advice (DAMA). We aimed to improve access to opioid substitution therapy (OST) for hospital inpatients, using the iHOST ('improving hospital opioid substitution therapy') clinical guidelines, developed through a deliberative consensus process in partnership with clinical, academic and peer experts with professional body oversight.
methodsThis pre-post quality improvement study evaluates implementation of the iHOST guideline at a tertiary hospital serving inner city London, UK between 2021 and 2023. Clinical records of all patients administered OST in the 12 months before and 11 months after the policy's introduction were evaluated for measures of process (reducing urine drug screening, improving time-to-administration), balancing (avoiding emergency naloxone administration, avoiding increased mortality) and outcome (discharge against medical advice).
resultsAmong 259 patients pre-policy and 194 post-policy, the median time to first methadone dose fell from 18.1 hours to 14.8 hours and the proportion of patients waiting more than 24 hours reduced from 32% to 21% (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.88). Urine drug screening was one-sixth as likely to be performed on admission. There was no change in the likelihood of discharge against medical advice, which occurred for 24% of admissions during both periods (p=0.96). Naloxone was required for only 2% of admissions (five pre-policy, four times post p=1.00), indicating no compromise of patient safety.
conclusionsImplementing the iHOST guideline successfully reduced unnecessary delays to methadone administration without increasing the risk of opioid toxicity. While high rates of DAMA, even after improving access to OST, point to an ongoing need for patient-centred engagement strategies, successful implementation of the iHOST guideline supports its wider use: it is now under evaluation in two additional hospitals, after which it will be optimised to assess its utility for nation-wide practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.