Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42413925›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2026

MRI-based 3D cartilage modelling in the elbow joint : a validation study with potential for biomechanical modelling.

Tasuku Miyake, Satoshi Miyamura, Ryoya Shiode, Toru Iwahashi, Arisa Kazui, Natsuki Yamamoto, Hiroki Kondo, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Seiji Okada, Tsuyoshi Murase and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tasuku MiyakeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-7404-2460
Satoshi MiyamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2245-5554
Ryoya ShiodeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3148-0399
Toru IwahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-5191
Arisa KazuiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-5964-5594
Natsuki YamamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-4478-1789
Hiroki KondoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5348-7762
Hiroyuki TanakaDepartment of Sports Medical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8622-7422
Seiji OkadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5107-8209
Tsuyoshi MuraseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bell-land General Hospital, Sakai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5628-5891
Kunihiro OkaDepartment of Orthopaedic Biomaterial Science, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7770-4634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To construct and validate a 3D MRI-based cartilage model of the elbow joint by comparing it with laser-scanned models and to assess how cartilage morphology influences intra-articular stress distribution through finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: Seven formalin-fixed cadaveric elbows were scanned using high-resolution MRI (voxel size: 0.375 × 0.375 × 0.400 mm), with sequences selected based on the contrast-to-noise ratio. Cartilage models of the distal humerus, radial head, and proximal ulna were reconstructed and validated against laser-scanned reference models. Validation metrics included cartilage thickness differences, surface-to-surface distances, and Dice similarity coefficients. Subsequently, FEA was performed using models with and without cartilage, under physiological loading, to evaluate the intra-articular stress distribution. Results: MRI-based and laser-scanned models showed similar cartilage thickness distributions, with differences within or close to the imaging resolution. The median cartilage thicknesses measured using the MRI-based and laser-scanned models were 1.15 mm (IQR 0.97 to 1.54) and 1.25 mm (IQR 1.14 to 1.29) in the distal humerus, 1.15 mm (IQR 0.97 to 1.18) and 1.03 mm (IQR 1.01 to 1.14) in the radial head, and 1.06 mm (IQR 0.93 to 1.21) and 1.05 mm (IQR 1.00 to 1.10) in the proximal ulna, respectively. The surface-to-surface root mean square distances were < 0.40 mm, and the Dice coefficients exceeded 0.96. FEA revealed physiologically plausible stress concentration patterns at anatomical contact areas only in models incorporating the cartilage. Conclusion: The 3D MRI-based cartilage models have high geometrical accuracy and biomechanical validity. These models offer a noninvasive tool for assessing cartilage morphology and joint mechanics, and may provide a foundation for future studies investigating the pathophysiology of elbow osteoarthritis.

Identifiers

PMID42413925
PMCPMC13341216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.