ArticleVision research2026
A new oculomotor model demystifies "Remarkable Saccades".
Article in Vision research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hering's Law of binocular eye movement control guides most oculomotor research and supports diagnosis and treatment of clinical eye misalignment (strabismus). It states that all eye movements are controlled by a unitary conjugate signal and a unitary vergence signal that sum. Recent evidence of temporally asynchronous eye rotations during vergence (Chandna et al., 2021) challenges the viability of a unitary vergence signal. Helmholtz proposed an explanation of binocular control that does not require a vergence system, that the eyes are controlled independently. Yet independent control fails to explain "Remarkable Saccades", inappropriate saccades that occur from an eye aligned on a target during asymmetric vergence (Enright, 1992). Here we present a novel computational architecture of binocular eye movement control based on a concept proposed in Chandna et al. (2021). Our "Hybrid Binocular Control" (HBC) model incorporates simplified pursuit and saccadic components. The pursuit component is implemented with independent controllers for each eye that interact with the saccade component, a unitary conjugate controller. The model generates remarkable saccades as an emergent property, and a variable attentional gain allows it to generate behavioral variations in remarkable saccades that occur when observers attend to one eye's view. In its current form, the model's output matches not only the remarkable saccade profiles well, but other saccade types. However, it does not attempt to specify their exact dynamics or underlying circuitry. The model's novel architecture operates without a vergence signal and makes predictions about how conjugate and independent controller signals interact. Furthermore, it suggests exciting exploration of neural oculomotor circuitry and inspires systematic investigations of asymmetric eye movements and their resulting main sequences necessary for further model elaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.