ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2026
Stimulation of Right Temporal Cortex Enhances Talker Typicality Judgments.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Listeners are exquisitely sensitive to the ways that different talkers produce speech sounds, and such sensitivity may allow listeners to condition speech perception on talker information. A growing body of neuroimaging data suggests that although phonetic processing is largely supported by the brain's left hemisphere, the integration of talker information during speech perception recruits the right hemisphere, especially right temporal cortex. However, an open question is whether recruitment of the right hemisphere is strictly necessary for integrating talker information and phonetic detail or simply incidental. Here, we leverage TMS to test for a causal role of the right middle temporal gyrus (RMTG) in accessing a listener's beliefs about a talker's phonetic signature. During an initial exposure phase, participants heard pairs of talkers, one of whom produced voiceless stop consonants (e.g., /k/) with a relatively short voice onset time (VOT) and one who employed relatively long VOTs; listeners learned what variation was typical of each talker without disruption from TMS. During a subsequent test, TMS was administered to the RMTG, left middle temporal gyrus (LMTG), or a control site (scalp vertex) before listeners judged whether VOT variants were typical of a learned talker. We found that listeners were best able to determine what phonetic variation was typical of a talker following RMTG stimulation; stimulation of the LMTG did not influence performance relative to vertex stimulation. Overall, results indicate that the balance of activation across the two hemispheres is critical for accessing talker-specific phonetic detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.