Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42413024›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of organic chemistry2026

Solvent Stabilization of Protic Oxonium/Ammonium Intermediates in Cation Radical Cyclization Reactions Investigated via Computational Approaches.

Shahriar N Khan, John H Hymel, Jesse G McDaniel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of organic chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahriar N KhanSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
John H HymelSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4917-7865
Jesse G McDanielSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9211-1108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anodic intramolecular cyclization reactions have substantial synthetic utility for formation of cyclic carbon-carbon or carbon-heteroatom bonds. For cases of intramolecular trapping of a cation radical by a protic nucleophile, the cyclization step coincides with a substantial increase in substrate acidity and thus may exhibit particularly pronounced solvent effects. In this computational work, we employ both quantum chemical (QM) and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods to compute solvent effects on free energy profiles for cyclization and deprotonation reaction steps for cation radical intermediates of substrates representative for anodic intramolecular cyclizations. We find substantial solvent contribution to the thermodynamic driving force for cation radical cyclization; for example, methanol and tetrahydrofuran solvents provide ∼30-35 kJ/mol driving force to form cyclic oxonium cation radicals and ∼15-25 kJ/mol driving force to form cyclic ammonium cation radicals, compared to baseline reactions in dichloromethane solvent. Given that these solvent shifts are on par with the innate cyclization reaction thermodynamics, the choice of solvent plays a crucial role in promoting/driving the cation radical cyclization step. Methanol is particularly effective at facilitating rapid deprotonation of the cyclic cation radical intermediate, which may lead to the full electrochemical process (e.g., second electron transfer) proceeding heterogeneously at the anode.

Identifiers

PMID42413024
PMCPMC13386538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.