ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Guiding the Ethics of Locator Devices in Dementia Care: Tutorial on Developing a Question-Based Ethical Framework.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Locator devices are increasingly being used to help manage wandering among people living with dementia. While these technologies can be beneficial, they also raise significant ethical questions. These ethical questions are faced in both the development and use of these devices. Objective: The aim of this study is to develop and present a question-based ethical framework that can guide both the use and the development of locator devices in dementia care, ensuring that stakeholder needs and values are balanced effectively. Methods: A four-step process informed the framework's creation: (1) literature collection (systematic searches of empirical, normative, and development-focused research were conducted); (2) content analysis (an inductive qualitative analysis of collected literature identified key ethical concerns, arguments, and stakeholder perspectives); (3) iterative framework drafting (insights were translated into open-ended questions and refined through regular team discussions); and (4) stakeholder consultation (feedback from health professionals, older adults, family members, developers, and ethicists was used to refine and finalize the framework). Results: The resulting framework is organized around 3 themes-vision, process, and impact-each containing guiding questions that encourage dialogical reflection and decision-making. For "use," these questions help care communities clarify goals, define processes, and assess outcomes. For "development," they aid developers in articulating device objectives, anticipating risks, and aligning product features with end-user values. Conclusions: By providing guiding questions that can be adapted to local needs and contexts, this framework fosters a more inclusive, transparent, and ethically accountable approach to developing and using locator devices in dementia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.