ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Quantifying domain-specific relevance of computational biology Wikipedia articles using TF-IDF and cosine similarity.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationWikipedia is one of the world's most visited websites and serves as the principal open educational resource for computational biology. However, identifying which articles are most relevant to distinct sub-disciplines of computational biology remains largely subjective.
resultsThis study collected short descriptions for 22 Communities of Special Interest (COSI) groups maintained by the International Society for Computational Biology and downloaded 1536 computational biology articles from English Wikipedia. Following standard text preprocessing, COSI descriptions and Wikipedia articles were embedded in a common TF-IDF vector space. Semantic relatedness was quantified using cosine similarity, yielding a real-valued relevance matrix that maps each COSI to the most pertinent computational biology articles. The resulting scores, typically low in absolute value, captured nuanced differences: general-interest pages such as 'Computational biology' and 'Bioinformatics' ranked highest, whereas niche pages showed high relevance only for specific COSIs. Unsupervised analysis using principal component analysis, k-nearest neighbours, and Leiden community detection revealed clusters of articles corresponding to the particular COSIs and highlighted inter-COSI relationships. This automated pipeline reduces bias compared with manual tagging and enables more precise curation of domain-specific educational resources. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The relevance matrix developed in this study is available in the Zenodo repository (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18311878).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.