ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
NPBIP: predicting binding preferences of uncharacterized nucleic-acid-binding proteins.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationNucleic-acid-binding proteins (NBPs) are crucial regulators of gene expression, recognizing specific RNA or DNA binding sites. While high-throughput experiments have generated vast amounts of binding data, a significant challenge remains in predicting binding affinities of a novel query NBP to any nucleic-acid sequence. Current computational methods often require prior experimental data for the query NBP or are limited to predictions over predefined short RNA or DNA sequences.
resultsWe present New Protein Binding Intensity Predictor (NPBIP), a new method to predict the binding of a query NBP to any RNA or DNA sequence by integrating two complementary components: (i) a similarity-based method that computes a weighted mean of binding predictions over the training NBPs; and (ii) a deep-learning model that combines a large protein language model with a hybrid convolutional-transformer network to predict binding directly. We trained and evaluated NPBIP on 420 RNA-binding protein (RBP) experiments and 464 DNA-binding protein (DBP) experiments. NPBIP significantly outperformed each of its components and all competing baselines, achieving a mean Pearson correlation of 0.414±0.20 and 0.581±0.22 over the RNA- and DNA-binding experiments, respectively. This prediction performance was statistically comparable to an experimental k-mer upper bound over RBPs and statistically superior to an upper bound over DBPs. Furthermore, our interpretability analysis demonstrates that NPBIP recovers canonical binding motifs for both RBPs and DBPs, providing biological validation for the model's predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/OrensteinLab/NPBIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.