ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Incorporating indel channels into average-case analysis of seed-chain-extend.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGiven a sequence s1 of n letters drawn independently and identically (i.i.d.) from an alphabet of size σ and a mutated substring s2 of length m<n, we want to recover the mutation history that generated s2 from s1. Many modern sequence aligners for this task use seed-chain-extend with k-mer seeds. Previously, Shaw and Yu showed linear-gap cost chaining can produce a chain with 1-O(1m) recoverability, the proportion of the mutation history that is recovered, in O(mn2.43θ log n) expected time for seed-chain-extend (assuming pre-seeded reference), where θ<0.206 is the mutation rate under a substitution-only channel and s1 is uniformly random. A gap remains between theory and practice, as real genomes include insertions and deletions (indels).
resultsWe introduce mathematical machinery to deal with the two new obstacles introduced by indel channels: the dependence of neighbouring anchors and the presence of anchors that are only partially correct. We prove that expected recoverability of an optimal chain is ≥1-O(1m) and expected runtime is O(mn3.15·θT log n), given the total mutation rate θT=θi+θd+θs (sum of substitution, insertion, and deletion rates) is θT≤0.159. We thus narrow (but not close) the gap between theory and practice. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/Lazarus42/seed_chainer_indels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.