ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
CAMUS: scalable phylogenetic network estimation.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- BROOQS: Spectral Methods Resolve Level-1 Hybridization Cycles without Tests of Symmetry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Incomplete climate-driven peripatric speciation in Moehringia sect. Moehringia (Caryophyllaceae) in the European Alps.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- CAMUS: scalable phylogenetic network estimation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationPhylogenetic networks are models of evolution that go beyond trees, and so represent reticulate events such as horizontal gene transfer or hybridization, which are frequently found in many taxa. Yet, the estimation of phylogenetic networks is extremely computationally challenging, and nearly all methods are limited to very small datasets with perhaps 10-15 species (some limited to even smaller numbers).
resultsWe introduce Constrained Algorithm Maximizing qUartetS (CAMUS), a scalable method for phylogenetic network estimation. CAMUS takes an input rooted constraint tree T as well as a set Q of unrooted quartet trees and returns a level-1 phylogenetic network N that is built upon T through the addition of edges, in order to maximize the number of quartet trees in Q that are induced in N. We perform a simulation study under the Network Multi-Species Coalescent and show that a simple pipeline using CAMUS provides high accuracy and outstanding speed and scalability, in comparison to two leading methods, PhyloNet-MPL used with a fixed tree and SNaQ. CAMUS is slightly less accurate than PhyloNet-MPL used without a fixed tree, but is much faster (minutes instead of hours) and can complete on inputs with 201 species while PhyloNet-MPL fails to complete on the inputs with more than 51 species. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code is available at https://github.com/jsdoublel/camus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.