Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412807›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

CAMUS: scalable phylogenetic network estimation.

James Willson, Tandy Warnow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CAMUS: scalable phylogenetic network estimation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James WillsonSiebel School of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8496-3597
Tandy WarnowSiebel School of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7717-3514

Funding

National Science Foundation 2316233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationPhylogenetic networks are models of evolution that go beyond trees, and so represent reticulate events such as horizontal gene transfer or hybridization, which are frequently found in many taxa. Yet, the estimation of phylogenetic networks is extremely computationally challenging, and nearly all methods are limited to very small datasets with perhaps 10-15 species (some limited to even smaller numbers).

resultsWe introduce Constrained Algorithm Maximizing qUartetS (CAMUS), a scalable method for phylogenetic network estimation. CAMUS takes an input rooted constraint tree T as well as a set Q of unrooted quartet trees and returns a level-1 phylogenetic network N that is built upon T through the addition of edges, in order to maximize the number of quartet trees in Q that are induced in N. We perform a simulation study under the Network Multi-Species Coalescent and show that a simple pipeline using CAMUS provides high accuracy and outstanding speed and scalability, in comparison to two leading methods, PhyloNet-MPL used with a fixed tree and SNaQ. CAMUS is slightly less accurate than PhyloNet-MPL used without a fixed tree, but is much faster (minutes instead of hours) and can complete on inputs with 201 species while PhyloNet-MPL fails to complete on the inputs with more than 51 species. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code is available at https://github.com/jsdoublel/camus.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyPhylogenySoftwareEvolution, MolecularModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID42412807
PMCPMC13340232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.