ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Foundation model enables interpretable open and error-tolerant searching for mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EmmaEmb: A quantitative framework for analyzing embedding spaces in molecular biology.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- A Framework for Database Search with AI Models in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMass spectrometry-based proteomics allows studying all proteins of a sample on a molecular level. However, mass spectra are noisy and contain complex patterns, making them inherently challenging to analyze with algorithmic approaches. In terms of the protein sequence landscape, most recent bottom-up MS-based proteomics studies consider either a diverse pool of post-translational modifications, employ large databases-as in metaproteomics or proteogenomics, study multiple isoforms of proteins, include unspecific cleavage sites or even combinations thereof. All this makes peptide and protein identifications challenging.
resultsHere, we present a foundation model, called yHydra, that jointly embeds spectra and peptides. This allows us to implement various downstream tasks and search modes in Euclidean space. We implement an open search which allows querying multiple ten-thousands of spectra against millions of peptides. Furthermore, we implement an error-tolerant search for identifying additional proteoforms that are not included in off-the-shelf reference proteomes. Our foundation model provides meaningful embeddings, as we interpret learned peptide embeddings in comparison to the peptide's physico-chemical properties. Hydra's open search, assigns delta masses to each identification which allows to unrestrictedly characterize post-translational modifications. The error-tolerant mode of yHydra can be used as post-processing to existing search engines or as a standalone. yHydra is evaluated on several real life data sets for the identification of modified peptide sequences and shows up to 25% increase in peptide identification at constant false discovery rate compared to the current state-of-the-art. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code is available on Gitlab: https://gitlab.com/dacs-hpi/yHydra, and https://gitlab.com/dacs-hpi/yHydra_train.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.