ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Detecting and reconstructing breakage-fusion-bridge cycles from long-read sequencing using BFBArchitect.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationFocal oncogene amplification is a key driver of tumor progression. Remarkably, the increased pathology depends on the context-whether the amplification is extrachromosomal (ecDNA) or intrachromosomal. EcDNA amplifications promote heterogeneity, therapy resistance, and poor prognosis. Focal intrachromosomal amplifications often arise through breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycles, which produce highly rearranged but stable chromosomes. Distinguishing BFB from ecDNA remains challenging due to overlapping genomic signatures. To address this, we present BFBArchitect, a computational method leveraging long-read Oxford Nanopore data to identify BFB sequences consistent with both copy number and structural variations.
resultsWe provide a novel combinatorial characterization of BFB, which naturally leads to an integer linear programming (ILP) optimization. The ILP optimization generates a BFB sequence that best explains experimentally observed copy numbers and foldback structural variants. We implement this idea in a tool called BFBArchitect, which achieves near-perfect accuracy in distinguishing BFB from non-BFB structures in extensive simulations as well as on 18 validated tumor samples. Moreover, it generates sequence-level BFB reconstructions that provide mechanistic insights into BFB formation, including repair mechanisms with template switching and other structural variants, and recapture of telomere for stabilization. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BFBArchitect is available at https://github.com/AmpliconSuite/BFBArchitect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.