ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
eGoT: enhanced graph-of-thoughts for multi-hop knowledge retrieval and hypothesis generation in biomedicine.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An agentic AI framework connecting language models to electronic health records and a biomedical knowledge graph for real-world evidence.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in lung cancer care: current applications, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationResearch on biological mechanisms and disease processes is limited by fragmented findings across unstructured text in publications. Question answering and hypothesis generation that can reason across multiple sources can overcome this limitation. However, Large language models (LLMs) are prone to inaccuracies and lack clear provenance to primary evidence. Retrieval augmented generation approaches that have provenance to the original source of evidence address these shortcomings. However, the response richness is dependent on the retrieval process design. Current approaches often fail to produce responses requiring multi-hop reasoning across multiple domains.
resultsTo address this, we propose eGoT, which combines automated knowledge graph construction from biomedical literature with a novel graph-of-thoughts approach to query the knowledge base and construct comprehensive responses to natural language questions. Given a corpus of documents, eGoT first uses an LLM-based pipeline to identify and normalize entities and relationships and constructs graph and vector databases. Given an input question, eGoT performs multi-round LLM-based querying of the databases to construct a response. Benchmarking on datasets like MultiHopRAG, HotpotQA, and Ultradomain demonstrates eGoT's superiority over state-of-the-art retrieval methods, including HopRAG, SireRAG, HiRAG, and HippoRAG. We demonstrate eGoT on two biomedical use cases: (i) generate responses to domain expert-curated questions on small cell lung cancer using 1046 PubMed Central publications, and (ii) demonstrate eGoT's ability to find plausible connections between Lupus and climate factors (UV exposure) that affect disease trajectory. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/NNeuralDynamics/eGOT.git.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.