Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412787›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

eGoT: enhanced graph-of-thoughts for multi-hop knowledge retrieval and hypothesis generation in biomedicine.

Nihar Sanda, Benjamin M Gyori, Vito Quaranta, Auroop Ganguly, Ayan Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nihar SandaThe Institute for Experiential AI, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5303-6400
Benjamin M GyoriKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Vito QuarantaThe Institute for Experiential AI, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Auroop GangulyThe Institute for Experiential AI, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Ayan PaulThe Institute for Experiential AI, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States.

Funding

Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & SupportASKEM HR00112220036DARPAIndiana University CIS250780National Science Foundation 2137603National Science Foundation 2138259National Science Foundation 2138286National Science Foundation 2138296National Science Foundation 2138307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationResearch on biological mechanisms and disease processes is limited by fragmented findings across unstructured text in publications. Question answering and hypothesis generation that can reason across multiple sources can overcome this limitation. However, Large language models (LLMs) are prone to inaccuracies and lack clear provenance to primary evidence. Retrieval augmented generation approaches that have provenance to the original source of evidence address these shortcomings. However, the response richness is dependent on the retrieval process design. Current approaches often fail to produce responses requiring multi-hop reasoning across multiple domains.

resultsTo address this, we propose eGoT, which combines automated knowledge graph construction from biomedical literature with a novel graph-of-thoughts approach to query the knowledge base and construct comprehensive responses to natural language questions. Given a corpus of documents, eGoT first uses an LLM-based pipeline to identify and normalize entities and relationships and constructs graph and vector databases. Given an input question, eGoT performs multi-round LLM-based querying of the databases to construct a response. Benchmarking on datasets like MultiHopRAG, HotpotQA, and Ultradomain demonstrates eGoT's superiority over state-of-the-art retrieval methods, including HopRAG, SireRAG, HiRAG, and HippoRAG. We demonstrate eGoT on two biomedical use cases: (i) generate responses to domain expert-curated questions on small cell lung cancer using 1046 PubMed Central publications, and (ii) demonstrate eGoT's ability to find plausible connections between Lupus and climate factors (UV exposure) that affect disease trajectory. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/NNeuralDynamics/eGOT.git.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchComputational BiologyData MiningInformation Storage and RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingSoftwareDatabases, FactualHumansKnowledge BasesLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID42412787
PMCPMC13341121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.