Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412786›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Inferring and evaluating network medicine-based disease modules with nextflow.

Johannes Kersting, Chloé Bucheron, Lisa M Spindler, Joaquim Aguirre-Plans, Quirin Manz, Tanja Pock, Mo Tan, Fernando M Delgado-Chaves, Cristian Nogales, Harald H H W Schmidt and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A Framework for Benchmarking Pathway Reconstruction Algorithms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Johannes KerstingData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-0093
Chloé BucheronMax Perutz Labs, Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0004-0699-6475
Lisa M SpindlerData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-3502-3033
Joaquim Aguirre-PlansDiscovery and Data Science (DDS) Unit, STALICLA SL, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-1350
Quirin ManzData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5706-2718
Tanja PockData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-4106-4659
Mo TanData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-6706-2789
Fernando M Delgado-ChavesInstitute for Computational Systems Biomedicine, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6171-1215
Cristian NogalesMax Perutz Labs, Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7535-0417
Harald H H W SchmidtDepartment of Pharmacology and Personalised Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0419-5549
Jörg MencheMax Perutz Labs, Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1583-6404
Andreas MaierInstitute for Computational Systems Biomedicine, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4408-0068
Jan BaumbachInstitute for Computational Systems Biomedicine, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0282-0462
Emre GuneyDiscovery and Data Science (DDS) Unit, STALICLA SL, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3466-6535
Markus ListData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0941-4168

Funding

Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Research Executive AgencyEuropean Union 101057619German Research Foundation 422216132Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research, and Innovation 22.00115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMost diseases result from complex molecular interactions of genes and proteins. Various network-based methods characterize these mechanisms by expanding seed genes into disease modules. Their underlying algorithmic strategies differ, making it difficult to determine which of the created modules are most useful or biologically plausible.

resultsTo address this challenge, we developed an all-in-one pipeline that handles installation, input preparation, execution, and systematic evaluation of six widely used module detection tools, considering module topology, functional coherence, robustness, and the capacity to recover seeds. To showcase the value of our pipeline and provide guidance to potential users, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation across 50 different disease-network combinations, revealing substantial variability among the derived disease modules, driven by both network and algorithm choices. We show that methods are robust to minor perturbations but struggle to recover omitted seeds. None consistently outperforms all others, underscoring the need for careful method selection. Our work enables the systematic comparison of disease module discovery approaches and promotes reproducible network medicine research. Integrated into the nf-core project, it is intended as an extendable, long-term resource for tracking progress in the field. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The pipeline is implemented in Nextflow. Code and documentation are available through GitHub (https://github.com/nf-core/diseasemodulediscovery) and the nf-core website (https://nf-co.re/diseasemodulediscovery). Code and data used for demonstrating the pipeline are available through GitHub (https://github.com/REPO4EU/modulediscovery_demonstration).

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDiseaseGene Regulatory NetworksSoftwareAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID42412786
PMCPMC13340264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.