ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
USP-ddG: a unified structural paradigm with data efficacy and mixture-of-experts for predicting mutational effects on protein-protein interactions.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAccurately estimating changes in binding free energy (ΔΔG) is critical for understanding protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and guiding rational protein design. Recent deep learning methods have achieved notable progress by pre-training on large-scale structural data. While some approaches explore structural flexibility through energy-based sampling or generative modeling, these strategies typically involve substantial computational cost and overlook data efficacy in terms of training data organization.
resultsWe present USP-ddG, a unified structural paradigm for ΔΔG prediction built on a dual-channel architecture. The model incorporates three complementary components: (i) an inverse folding-based log-odds ratio, (ii) the empirical force field FoldX capturing side-chain packing energetics, and (iii) a geometric encoder that leverages Gaussian coordinate perturbation as a regularization strategy to improve robustness. To enhance representation capacity, we introduce a framework that integrates feed-forward network (FFN) and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) to model domain-invariant and -specific features, respectively. We further propose CATH-guided Folding Ordering (CFO), a data efficacy strategy that organizes samples to mitigate catastrophic forgetting and data distribution bias. USP-ddG consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods on the SKEMPI v2.0 benchmark, including the challenging hold-out CATH test set. It achieves superior accuracy on both single- and multi-point mutations and demonstrates strong performance in antibody affinity optimization against H1N1 and HER2, and in predicting the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on hACE2 binding. Ablation studies confirm the contribution of each component. These results highlight USP-ddG as a robust and data-efficient framework for modeling mutational effects on PPIs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: USP-ddG is available at https://github.com/ak422/USP-ddG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.