ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Post-surgical scar management and rehabilitation in burn patients: Insights from Gaza's challenging context - A retrospective descriptive study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn injuries represent a challenge in the Gaza Strip, where access to rehabilitation services is constrained by ongoing conflict and limited healthcare resources. This study describes the implementation and outcomes of rehabilitation and physiotherapy services for patients with post-surgical skin grafts (SSG) scars treated in Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) outpatient clinics in Gaza. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study using routinely collected programmatic data from patients with SSG scars enrolled in MSF post-operative outpatient clinics in the Gaza Strip (Gaza City, Beit Lahia, and Khan Younis), between January 2018 and December 2020. Outcomes were assessed using five measures: reducibility score, Functional Activity for Burn (FAB) score, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and an itching score. A total of 177 patient records were included. Most patients were children under 18 years (n = 136, 76.8%), and scald burns were the most common injury mechanism (n = 119, 67.6%). Improvements were observed across several clinical and patient-reported outcomes during follow-up. Mean pain scores decreased from 5.3 (SD: 2.5) to 1.4 (SD: 1.8), itching scores from 3.7 (SD: 2.7) to 2.7 (SD: 2.2), and VSS scores from 7.1 (SD: 1.8) to 5.7 (SD: 1.7). Functional outcomes improved, with mean FAB scores increasing from 25.6 (SD: 7.1) to 34.6 (SD: 2.3), while reducibility scores decreased from 2.3 (SD: 1.4) to 0.8 (SD: 0.9). Our findings describe the implementation of rehabilitation and physiotherapy services and document improvements observed during follow-up among burn patients in the Gaza Strip. Despite the challenging environment, MSF's clinic in Gaza demonstrated the feasibility of delivering rehabilitation care to burn survivors in a conflict-affected area. Further research is needed to refine and validate best practices in rehabilitation interventions tailored to the specific needs of patients in conflict-affected and resource-constrained settings and to continue improving the quality of care for burn survivors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.