Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412542›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Technology-Enhanced Peer Support for Depression in Older Adults: Single-Arm Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Jin Hui Joo, Alice Xie, Samuel Van Vleet, Joseph Locascio, Kristina Brackpool, Fei Wu, Namkee Choi, Phyllis Solomon, Nicholas Cloney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jin Hui JooDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2888-5157
Alice XieDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-3480-6939
Samuel Van VleetDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2694-3264
Joseph LocascioDepartment of Neurology, Harvard Catalyst Biostatistical Group, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3439-1209
Kristina BrackpoolDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3211-602X
Fei WuDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6212-8750
Namkee ChoiSchool of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8382-1191
Phyllis SolomonSchool of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0880-8966
Nicholas CloneyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-9590-5578

Funding

Peer Enhanced Depression Care: Using Peer Mentors to Provide Self-Care Support to Low-Income and Minority Older AdultsR01MH123165 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JOO, JIN HUI · 2019 to 2022
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression in late life is often compounded by social isolation and barriers to care. There is limited study of technology-enhanced peer support for depression among older adults.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a technology-enhanced peer support intervention to decrease depression among older adults.

methodsWe used a mixed methods pilot study among adults aged 50 years and older with depression who received a peer support intervention called Peers+. The intervention consisted of 8 weekly video chats and unidirectional texts focused on increasing depression self-care and coping. Data obtained from screening, baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up were used in the analysis to assess preliminary outcomes of the intervention. Mixed effects longitudinal models were used to assess change in depression, and qualitative data were collected and analyzed to identify key themes related to participant experiences.

resultsA total of 34 older adults with a mean age of 67 (SD 9.57) years participated in the study, and 82.4% (28/34) of participants finished all 8 intervention meetings. Depressive symptoms declined over the course of the study of 35 weeks (F

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a peer support intervention enhanced by video chats and texts, delivered by older adult peer coaches to an ethnically diverse group of older adults with depression. Study findings indicate that ongoing and accessible technology support contributed to older adult participation and engagement.

Indexed as

DepressionPeer GroupSocial SupportAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchSelf Careagingdepressionhealth services researchinterventionmental healtholder adultspeer supportpsychosocialsocial support

Identifiers

PMID42412542
PMCPMC13389471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.