ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026
Radioligand therapy for pediatric patients with solid tumors.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite significant advances in the treatment of childhood cancers, progress in improving outcomes for many pediatric solid tumors remains limited, particularly in patients with relapsed or metastatic disease. Current treatment strategies, including surgery, chemotherapy, and external beam radiotherapy, can achieve disease control but are often associated with substantial acute and long-term toxicities that affect long-term development and impact the overall quality of life of survivors. Radioligand therapy (RLT) has emerged as a promising targeted therapeutic strategy that combines tumor-specific ligands with radioactive isotopes, enabling the selective delivery of radiation to cancer cells while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. In adult oncology, RLT has demonstrated substantial clinical benefit in several malignancies, although this has not yet translated to pediatric cancers. Early clinical studies have explored the use of RLT in pediatric solid tumors, particularly in neuroblastoma, but the available evidence remains fragmented and is largely limited to small series. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the current clinical evidence on the use of RLT in pediatric solid tumors, including relevant molecular targets, radiopharmaceuticals, clinical outcomes, and safety profiles, and to discuss the key challenges and future directions for the development of RLT in pediatric oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.