ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Long-term follow-up of pelvic peritoneum reconstruction with bladder peritoneum flap after extralevator abdominoperineal excision.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04177407 (Pelvic Peritoneum Reconstruction Using the Bladder Peritoneum Flap in Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision --- A Multi-center, Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pelvic Peritoneum Reconstruction Using the Bladder Peritoneum Flap in Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision --- A Multi-center, Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study (IDEAL Phase 2A)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (L-ELAPE) for low-located rectal cancer may leave a dead presacral space, which may cause empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) and perineal hernia (PH). Bladder peritoneum flap reconstruction (BLAPER) is a novel pelvic peritoneum reconstruction technique that may partition the abdominal and pelvic cavity and thus prevent the occurrence of EPS and PH. This study aimed to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of the BLAPER technique to prevent the occurrence of PH and small bowel obstruction (SBO) for rectal cancer patients who underwent L-ELAPE. We conducted a prospective single-arm study. Patients who were diagnosed with low rectal cancer and underwent L-ELAPE with BLAPER procedure were included. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of long-term postoperative complications, including PH and SBO. From April 2017 to June 2022, a total of 26 patients underwent L-ELAPE with a successful BLAPER procedure. The median follow-up time was 47 (13-64) months. No PH was found during the follow-up, with a 3.8% (1/26) incidence of SBO. Three patients (3/25, 12%) had severe urinary dysfunction according to the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) system. BLAPER is a safe procedure to separate the abdominal and pelvic cavity after L-ELAPE surgery and may prevent the occurrence of PH and SBO. For low rectal cancer patients who undergo L-ELAPE, BLAPER may be an optional pelvic peritoneum reconstruction technique when the primary suture of pelvic peritoneum is not feasible.Clinical trial registration: The present study has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04177407).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42412373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.