ArticleGenes & genomics2026
Subtype-specific clinical significance of RRM1 and RRM2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a TCGA-based analysis.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), exhibits significant molecular heterogeneity. Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), composed of RRM1 and RRM2, is essential for DNA synthesis and repair, but its subtype-specific clinical significance in NSCLC remains unclear.
objectiveTo investigate the clinical and prognostic significance of RRM1 and RRM2 expression in NSCLC, with a focus on subtype-specific differences between LUAD and LUSC.
methodsWe analyzed RNA expression and clinical data from 980 NSCLC patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Associations with clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival, and oncogenic driver alterations were assessed.
resultsIn LUAD, high RRM2 expression was significantly associated with advanced pathologic stage (p = 0.004), nodal involvement (p = 0.005), higher T stage (p = 0.030), and gender (p = 0.046). In LUSC, RRM2 was associated with age (p = 0.008), pathologic stage (p = 0.006), and N stage (p = 0.001). RRM1 showed no significant associations with stage-related parameters in either subtype. Correlation analyses revealed modest associations between RRM1 and multiple oncogenic drivers, whereas RRM2 showed stronger subtype-specific correlations, particularly with KRAS/BRAF in LUAD and CDKN2A/SOX2 in LUSC. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that high expression of both RRM1 and RRM2 was associated with poorer overall survival in LUAD, but not in LUSC. However, neither marker remained significant after adjustment for clinicopathological variables in multivariate analysis.
conclusionRRM2 is associated with tumor progression in both NSCLC subtypes, while the prognostic associations of RRM1 and RRM2 are confined to LUAD. Although neither marker demonstrated independent prognostic significance in multivariate analysis, the findings support subtype-dependent roles of RNR components and highlight the potential biological and therapeutic relevance of nucleotide metabolism pathways in LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42412368What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.