Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412305›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

Social isolation and overall well-being among cancer survivors in the Cancer Prevention Study-3.

Anita R Peoples, Sicha Chantaprasopsuk, J Lee Westmaas, Erika Rees-Punia, Emily L Deubler, Lauren R Teras, W Dana Flanders, Charlie Zhong, Alpa V Patel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anita R PeoplesDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, 270 Peachtree Street NW Suite 1300, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Sicha ChantaprasopsukDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, 270 Peachtree Street NW Suite 1300, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA. sicha.chantaprasopsuk@cancer.org.
J Lee WestmaasTobacco Control Research, Department of Surveillance, Prevention, & Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Erika Rees-PuniaDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, 270 Peachtree Street NW Suite 1300, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Emily L DeublerDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, 270 Peachtree Street NW Suite 1300, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Lauren R TerasDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, 270 Peachtree Street NW Suite 1300, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
W Dana FlandersDepartments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Charlie ZhongDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, 270 Peachtree Street NW Suite 1300, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Alpa V PatelDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, 270 Peachtree Street NW Suite 1300, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSocial isolation is associated with poor health and sleep in the general population. However, its impact among cancer survivors-particularly as more individuals are living longer after a cancer diagnosis-remains unclear. We examined cross-sectional associations of social isolation with mental and physical health and sleep among cancer survivors ≤ 3 years ("shorter-term") and > 3 years post-diagnosis ("longer-term"), and cancer-free participants, using data from the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study-3 (CPS-3).

methodsAmong 2,290 shorter-term, 1,885 longer-term survivors, and 12,525 age-matched controls who completed the 2018 CPS-3 survey, multivariable-adjusted ANCOVAs evaluated associations between self-reported social isolation (Social Network Index), mental and physical health (PROMIS Global Health Scale), and sleep quality (single-item; PSQI).

resultsParticipants' mean age in 2018 was 60 years (SD = 8); 76% were female and 90% non-Hispanic White. Overall, 32% reported moderate-to-high social isolation, with similar proportions across shorter-term survivors, longer-term survivors, and controls. Higher social isolation was consistently associated with clinically meaningful lower mental health scores (poorer outcome) across all 3 groups. Longer-term survivors with high vs. low social isolation had significantly lower mental health scores by 5.8 units; this difference in mental health scores was statistically significantly larger than the corresponding differences among shorter-term survivors (-4.1 units; p < 0.001) and controls (-5.2 units; p = 0.03). Specifically, longer-term survivors who were older (≥ 65 years; difference = -7.0 units) or less physically active (< 15 MET-hr/wk; difference = -6.2 units) showed the largest differences in mental health scores when comparing high vs. low social isolation. No clinically meaningful associations were observed for physical health or sleep quality.

conclusionsHigher social isolation had the strongest associations with worse mental health among longer-term survivors, especially those who were older or less active. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These findings highlight the importance of routine screening for social isolation and the need for targeted psychosocial programs to improve well-being among survivors, particularly those living longer who may be most affected.

Indexed as

Cancer survivorshipMental healthOverall well-beingQuality of lifeSleep qualitySocial isolation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.