Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412291›Full record

ReviewEmergency radiology2026

CTA-positive, angiography-negative lower GI bleeding: an institutional imaging-guided management algorithm.

Elias Lugo-Fagundo, Hajra Ashrad, Carolina Lugo-Fagundo, Connor W Smith, Christos Georgiades, Elliot K Fishman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elias Lugo-Fagundo *Office of Medical Education, Duke University School of Medicine, 8 Searle Center Dr. Durham, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. elias.lugofagundo@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6982-4583
Hajra Ashrad *The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9206-739X
Carolina Lugo-Fagundo *Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans St. Zayed 7203, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Connor W Smith *The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9099-9465
Christos Georgiades *Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans St. Zayed 7203, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-1639
Elliot K Fishman *The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2567-1658

Funding

Lustgarten Foundation Lustgarten FoundationSiemens Healthineers Siemens Healthineers
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common acute presentation in the emergency department (ED) that may require immediate, life-saving intervention. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) represents a frequent source of high-acuity ED presentations, requiring time-sensitive decisions regarding imaging selection, level of care, transfusion strategy, and subspecialty consultation. In such cases, rapid diagnosis and hemodynamic assessment are crucial and facilitated by a multimodal diagnostic approach. Colonoscopy, nuclear medicine studies, and cross-sectional imaging are well-established modalities for evaluating LGIB, with computed tomography angiography (CTA) rapidly emerging as a first-line diagnostic tool, particularly in hemodynamically unstable patients. When active extravasation is identified on CTA, patients are often referred for transcatheter angiography (TA) to enable localization and potential endovascular intervention. However, ambiguity remains regarding the appropriate management of cases in which active hemorrhage is identified on CTA but not reproduced on TA. This discordance may reflect the intermittent nature of hemorrhage, temporal delays between imaging and intervention, or differing detection thresholds across modalities, creating a significant diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma for emergency, gastroenterology, and interventional radiology teams involved in the acute management of LGIB. We propose an institutional, imaging-guided management strategy for patients with CTA-positive but angiography-negative LGIB, emphasizing a tiered approach that prioritizes conservative management with arterial sheath retention, followed by provocative angiography, and selective use of colonoscopy. These strategies are not applied in a rigid or sequential manner but rather represent complementary options that are selectively employed based on hemodynamic status, clinical trajectory, transfusion requirements, and evidence of ongoing or recurrent bleeding.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputed Tomography AngiographyGastrointestinal HemorrhageEmergency Service, HospitalHumansAngiographyColonoscopyComputed tomography angiographyEmbolizationEmergency radiologyGastrointestinal bleeding

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.