ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026
Hepatic and intestinal microcirculation and pulmonary inflammation in a model of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the rat.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to peripheral cannulation, veno-arterial (V-A) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy is increasingly used outside the cardiac operation room. Despite significant efforts toward improving therapy for septic shock, mortality remains high. In this context, V-A ECMO therapy remains controversial and has been associated with reduced intestinal microcirculation in a septic rat model. In addition to ECMO-induced inflammation, peripheral V-A ECMO therapy is associated with lower-body hyperoxia. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of V-A ECMO therapy on intestinal microcirculation and systemic and pulmonary inflammation in healthy rats without septic shock.
methodsThirty male Lewis rats were randomly assigned to three groups: sham, low-flow (60 mL/kg/min) and high-flow (90 mL/kg/min). V-A ECMO was established by jugular venous drainage and femoral arterial return. Intestinal and hepatic microcirculation were assessed by micro-light guide spectrophotometry after median laparotomy. Systemic and pulmonary inflammation were evaluated by measuring plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α), interleukins 6 (IL-6) and 10 (IL-10), and C-X-C motif chemokine ligands 2 (CXCL-2) and 5 (CXCL-5). Hemodynamic data were captured using a left ventricular pressure-volume catheter.
resultsIntestinal oxygenation did not differ significantly among groups (sham: 76%, low-flow: 77%, high-flow: 74%; all p > 0.05). In contrast, hepatic oxygenation was significantly lower during V-A ECMO therapy (sham: 43%, low-flow: 23%, high-flow: 27%; all p ≤ 0.001). TNF-α levels were significantly elevated during both low-flow (p = 0.027) and high-flow (p = 0.015) V-A ECMO therapy. In contrast, IL-10 levels were significantly reduced during low-flow (p = 0.009) but not high-flow (p = 1.000) V-A ECMO therapy, whereas IL-6 levels were not significantly affected (low-flow: p = 0.764, high-flow: p = 0.104). BAL analysis revealed significantly reduced IL-6 levels during high-flow (p = 0.010) but not low-flow (p = 0.288) V-A ECMO therapy, whereas CXCL-2 (low-flow: p = 1.000, high-flow: p = 0.634) and CXCL-5 (low-flow: p = 1.000, high-flow: p = 0.224) levels were not significantly affected.
conclusionsIn healthy rats, V-A ECMO therapy did not impair intestinal microcirculation and was associated with reduced pulmonary inflammation at the high flow rate, likely due to decreased pulmonary blood flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.