Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412278›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

Patient-Specific Adaptation of a Mechano-Regulatory Bone-Healing Model Using Longitudinal Loading Data.

A Bäumchen, R Reinardt, F Scherf, S Diebels, E Liodakis, M Orth, A Andres, M Roland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A Bäumchen *Applied Mechanics, Saarland University, Campus A4 2, 1. OG, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
R Reinardt *Applied Mechanics, Saarland University, Campus A4 2, 1. OG, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
F Scherf *Applied Mechanics, Saarland University, Campus A4 2, 1. OG, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
S DiebelsApplied Mechanics, Saarland University, Campus A4 2, 1. OG, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
E LiodakisDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
M OrthDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
A AndresApplied Mechanics, Saarland University, Campus A4 2, 1. OG, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
M RolandApplied Mechanics, Saarland University, Campus A4 2, 1. OG, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany. michael.roland@uni-saarland.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-1956

Funding

Werner Siemens-Stiftung Smart Implants 2.0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-specific simulation frameworks are increasingly used to support orthopaedic trauma decision-making, yet robust coupling of longitudinal loading data to mechano-regulated healing models remains challenging. Here, we present a workflow that links patient-specific finite element mechanics to an established mechano-regulatory reaction-diffusion healing model and updates boundary conditions longitudinally using weekly knee joint forces obtained from musculoskeletal simulation. Rather than proposing a new mechanobiological regulation law, the study addresses three methodological questions: how strongly stimulus choice affects predicted tissue differentiation on identical patient-specific finite element models, whether an Isaksson-based healing model can be stabilised for robust long-term implicit simulation under repeated load updates, and whether computationally efficient linear-elastic mechanics is sufficient for repeated longitudinal simulations under the present loading regime. Mechanical stimulus formulations from the literature were benchmarked on identical patient-specific finite element models to quantify their impact on predicted tissue differentiation. To enable stable long-term implicit simulations, we introduced a numerically robust modification of the available-space saturation terms in the proliferation and matrix production kinetics. In a single distal tibia clinical case, the simulation predicted predominantly bone-permissive stimulus conditions, progressive bone-matrix accumulation initiating from existing bone boundaries, and a pronounced reduction of implant-to-callus stress ratio over the first 40-50 days, indicating early critical fixation demand. Synthetic radiographs generated from the final Young's modulus distribution showed qualitative agreement with the dominant bridging pattern and regions of reduced mineralization observed in follow-up X-rays, whilst suggesting over-persistent callus consistent with the absence of secondary remodelling. Sensitivity analyses showed that small-strain linear elasticity provides near-equivalent stimulus-class distributions at substantially lower computational cost than nonlinear alternatives, supporting its use for high-throughput longitudinal pipelines. These results illustrate feasibility in a single clinical case; cohort-level validation and predictive performance for delayed union/non-union are topics of ongoing and future multi-case studies.

Indexed as

Fracture healing windowsFracture repair mechanobiologyImplant load sharingMechanical stimulusPatient-specific simulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.