SynthesisJournal of medical systems2026
Automatic Sleep Staging Using Cardiorespiratory Signals: A Systematic Review of Methodologies and Performance.
Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiorespiratory-based methods offer promising alternatives to traditional PSG for longitudinal sleep monitoring, holding significant systemic medical value for scalable sleep health management. This systematic review synthesizes methodological frameworks and performance outcomes of automatic sleep staging using cardiorespiratory signals. Four databases were searched and a total of 35 studies published since 2010 were identified. The analysis revealed that cardiorespiratory signal-based sleep staging achieved a practically meaningful accuracy of 70%, with no significant performance differences observed among signal modalities (cardiac signals, cardiorespiratory signals, or cardiac/cardiorespiratory signals combined with other non-EEG modalities) or between modeling algorithms (traditional machine learning vs. deep learning). However, we identified significant methodological heterogeneity and several critical model failure modes that hinder clinical translation, including the widespread lack of external validation, consistently poor classification of the N1 sleep stage, and limited generalization across diverse patient populations. To realize the technology's potential, future research must establish consensus-driven methodological guidelines and rigorously validate algorithms on large, demographically and clinically diverse datasets. These advances are essential for integrating cardiorespiratory-based sleep staging into healthcare systems as a scalable tool for population-level screening, longitudinal monitoring, and tiered clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42412255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.