Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412225›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2026

When remediation creates toxicological risk: transformation products and the soil exposome in contaminated agroecosystems.

Wajid Zaman, Asma Ayaz

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wajid ZamanDepartment of Life Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea. wajidzaman@yu.ac.kr.
Asma AyazFaculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remediation is often considered successful when parent contaminants decline, visible pollution disappears, or extractable concentrations fall below target values. In contaminated agroecosystems, however, contaminant disappearance does not necessarily mean toxicological risk disappearance. Agricultural soils are reactive exposure interfaces where pollutants interact with minerals, organic matter, enzymes, microbes, and plant roots, often generating transformation products with different mobility, persistence, bioavailability, and toxicity from their parent compounds. This commentary proposes the soil exposome as a framework for evaluating remediated agroecosystems as dynamic exposure systems shaped by chemical mixtures, transformation pathways, microbial responses, plant uptake, and potential dietary exposure. We argue that remediation can create or obscure risk when assessment remains limited to removal efficiency or parent-compound monitoring. A toxicology-oriented evaluation should therefore integrate transformation-product profiling, effect-based bioassays, bioavailability testing, microbial and soil-function indicators, phytotoxicity assessment, and crop-safety verification. Moving from pollutant removal to verified exposure-system recovery is essential for ensuring that remediation reduces toxicological hazard while supporting soil function, crop safety, and long-term environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

Contaminated agroecosystemsCrop exposureEffect-based bioassaysRemediation toxicologySoil exposomeTransformation products

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.