Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412199›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Impact of image enhancement on grading agreement of plus disease features in retinopathy of prematurity.

Fiammetta Catania, Amandine Barjol, Mathias Gallardo, Florence Metge, Lucile Sénicourt, Giuseppe Maria Albanese, Youssef Abdel Massih, Georges Caputo, Thibaut Chapron

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fiammetta CataniaDepartment of pediatric ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 29 Rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France. fiammettacatania@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-8120
Amandine BarjolDepartment of pediatric ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 29 Rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France.
Mathias GallardoUnité Data Science et Innovation, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 29 Rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France.
Florence MetgeDepartment of pediatric ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 29 Rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France.
Lucile SénicourtUnité Data Science et Innovation, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 29 Rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France.
Giuseppe Maria AlbaneseDepartment of pediatric ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 29 Rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France.
Youssef Abdel MassihDepartment of pediatric ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 29 Rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France.
Georges CaputoDepartment of pediatric ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 29 Rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France.
Thibaut ChapronDepartment of pediatric ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 29 Rue Manin, Paris, 75019, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine whether targeted image enhancement improves intergrader agreement in assessing vascular features of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and to identify which specific features and clinical subgroups benefit most.

methodsThis prospective image grading study included 48 eyes from preterm infants undergoing ROP screening at a tertiary care center. All eyes were imaged with the RetCam Envision system. For each eye, five fundus images centered on the optic disc were selected and underwent standardized enhancement combining blue-channel attenuation and CLAHE-based contrast optimization. Five pediatric ophthalmologists with varying ROP experience independently evaluated raw and enhanced image sets in two grading rounds, one month apart. For each quadrant, graders recorded the presence or absence of arterial and venous tortuosity and dilation. Intergrader agreement was quantified using unweighted and weighted Fleiss' kappa and overall percentage agreement.

resultsImage enhancement significantly improved intergrader agreement (mean weighted agreement: 61.5% for raw vs. 67.8% for enhanced images, p < 0.05). The greatest improvements were observed for arterial tortuosity (+ 11.9%) and vein tortuosity (+ 6.5%). Nasal quadrants showed the most pronounced benefit. Subgroup analyses revealed larger improvements in borderline pre-plus cases and in eyes that had previously received treatment.

conclusionsTargeted image enhancement improves intergrader agreement in the evaluation of plus disease in ROP, especially for diagnostically challenging features and regions. The strongest effect is seen in borderline and treated cases, supporting the integration of standardized preprocessing techniques to enhance diagnostic objectivity for both clinicians and AI-assisted systems.

Indexed as

Image enhancementIntergrader agreementPediatric retinaPlus diseaseRetinopathy of prematurity

Identifiers

PMID42412199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.