ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Mumps resurgence despite MMR: Limitations of current vaccines and the need for new strategies.
Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mumps has reemerged globally despite widespread use of the measles - mumps - rubella (MMR) vaccine, contrasting with the successful control of measles and rubella. This divergence reflects important limitations in the performance of the mumps component of the MMR vaccine and the programmatic framework in which it is delivered. Evidence from multiple settings indicates that mumps outbreaks continue to occur in highly vaccinated populations, driven by waning immunity, non-sterilizing immune responses, and sustained transmission in high-contact environments. In parallel, many low- and middle-income countries do not include mumps vaccination in national immunization programs, resulting in large susceptible populations and under-recognition of disease burden. Immunologically, current vaccines induce less durable humoral immunity, limited mucosal protection, and poorly defined correlates of protection, while antigenic differences between vaccine and circulating strains may further reduce effectiveness. Programmatically, the fixed MMR platform limits flexibility in tailoring strategies specific to mumps epidemiology. Addressing these challenges will require rethinking current approaches, including targeted booster strategies, consideration of stand-alone or bivalent vaccines, and development of next-generation vaccines capable of inducing broader and more durable, potentially mucosal immunity. A shift toward mumps-specific vaccination strategies is essential for sustained control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.