ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Femoral stem alignment and post-operative patient satisfaction: a retrospective analysis of total hip arthroplasty using computer-assisted equipment for placing cups.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUsing computer-assisted equipment (CAE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has facilitated improved accuracy of acetabular cup placement, but the impact of aligning the femoral stem on post-operative patient satisfaction remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the post-operative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and identified factors related to femoral stem alignment associated with post-operative PROMs after THA.
methodsThis retrospective study included 200 patients (205 hips; mean age, 67.3 ± 9.8 years) undergoing THA using CAE for acetabular cup placement at our hospital. Alignment parameters of the femoral stem, including stem anteversion, change in stem anteversion, femoral offset, and coronal and sagittal stem angles, were evaluated using computed tomography scans and radiographs. Patients were categorised into the normal and Low&High alignment groups based on predefined, clinically acceptable ranges and deviation from native femoral anatomy. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) at one year post-operatively.
resultsPatients in the normal alignment group demonstrated significantly higher JHEQ total and movement scores than those in the Low&High group. Through multivariate logistic regression analysis, we identified change in stem anteversion as an independent factor associated with high post-operative patient satisfaction.
conclusionAccurate femoral stem alignment, particularly minimizing deviations in stem anteversion from the native femoral anteversion, was significantly associated with improved post-operative PROMs after computer-assisted THA. These results highlight the importance of achieving accurate femoral stem alignment, even when acetabular cup placement is optimised using CAE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.