ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Management of the Buccal Fat Pad During Deep-Plane Facelift: Technique, Safety, and Aesthetic Outcomes in 68 Patients.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement of the buccal fat pad (BFP) has gained prominence in facial aesthetic surgery for refining mid and lower face contours. While intraoral excision is common, addressing the BFP during deep-plane facelift (DPFL) offers a direct, anatomically informed approach.
objectivesTo describe a surgical technique for BFP excision and suspension performed during DPFL and to evaluate its safety, effectiveness, and impact on lower facial contouring.
methodsThis retrospective case series included 68 patients (aged 45-64 years) who underwent DPFL with BFP management between February 2023 and September 2024 by a single surgeon. Patients with prior hyaluronic filler, thread lift, or microneedling radiofrequency were included; those with permanent filler were excluded. BFP prolapse was directly visualized during DPFL dissection. Partial excision (1.5-2.5 cc/side) was performed, followed by suspension of residual fat to the SMAS when indicated. Outcomes assessed included contour improvement, complications, and follow-up up to 8 months.
resultsAll patients demonstrated improved lower facial and jowl contour. Mean excised volume was 1.5-2.5 cc per side. Complications included three hematomas (4.4%), one transient buccal nerve paresis (1.5%), and two transient marginal mandibular nerve injuries (2.9%). No long-term adverse sequelae or excessive hollowing were observed.
conclusionsConcurrent BFP management during DPFL enables direct treatment of buccal fat prolapse, optimizes lower facial contour, and may reduce recurrence of jowling. This technique appears safe, effective, and enhances aesthetic outcomes with minimal morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42412177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.