ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Internal urethrotomy versus Optilume™ drug-coated balloon dilatation for the management of anterior urethral strictures: morbidity comparison of the techniques.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparable is not equivalent in short-term optilume evaluation.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Clinical insights: regarding "Internal urethrotomy versus Optilume™ drug-coated balloon dilatation for the management of anterior urethral strictures: morbidity comparison of the techniques".World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDirect visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) for short anterior urethral strictures is associated with a high rate of stricture recurrence. Optilume™ drug-coated balloon (ODCB) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive treatment alternative. However, comparative data between ODCB and DVIU are limited. This multicenter study aims to compare the two procedures in terms of functional outcomes and stricture-free survival (SFS) in patients with anterior urethral strictures.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 140 patients treated for anterior urethral stricture under 3 cm in length with either ODCB dilatation or internal urethrotomy. Data were collected from five European tertiary referral centers between November 2010 and April 2026. Stricture length was assessed by either cystoscopy, retrograde urethrography, or both. Stricture recurrence during follow-up was defined as symptomatic restenosis requiring reintervention. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of recurrence. SFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, with group comparisons assessed using the log-rank test. KEY
findingsA total of 68 (48%) patients underwent DVIU and 72 (52%) ODCB. Prior stricture treatment had been performed in 6 (9%) in the internal urethrotomy group and 56 (78%) in the ODCB group (p < 0.001). Prior dilatations were performed in 6 (9%) patients for DVIU and 27 (38%) for ODCB dilatation (p < 0.001). The groups were otherwise similar with regards to baseline characteristics, including stricture length, diabetes mellitus, stricture site. The median follow-up was 12 months (IQR: 4-29) in the internal urethrotomy group and 9.5 months (IQR: 5-14) in the ODCB group. Postoperative complications were reported in 3% of patients after DVIU and 6% after ODCB dilatation. Median preoperative IPSS was 20.5 (15-26) for DVIU and 18.5 (11-25) for ODCB dilatation (p = 0.4). The median IPSS after three months was 16 (13-20) for DVIU and 6.5 (3-11) for ODCB dilatation (p < 0.001). The type of surgery was not predictive of stricture recurrence at multivariable cox regression analysis. SFS after 12 months was 67% (95% CI: 56-80%) for internal urethrotomy and 68% (95% CI: 50-82%) for Optilume™ (p = 0.81).
conclusionsDespite being used in a substantially more pretreated cohort, ODCB dilatation showed similar safety and SFS after 12 months as compared to DVIU, suggesting a potential role as an effective salvage strategy after failed endoscopic treatment or even early line treatment. Future prospective studies are needed to better define selection criteria and optimal treatment sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.