ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026
How visual context influences lateral stepping regulation while walking on winding paths.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How visual context influences lateral stepping regulation while walking on winding paths.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Goal-directed walking involves regulating foot placements to achieve specific tasks. This requires visuomotor integration. Perceptual, cognitive, and contextual salience guide attention and motor planning for navigation. Here, we quantified how perceptual salience informs lateral foot placement while walking. Participants walked along prescribed virtual paths (straight or winding), thus keeping contextual salience (the task itself) constant. We manipulated perceptual salience by systematically altering environment richness (rich vs. sparse) and path color contrast (high vs. low). We quantified head pitch angle to approximate gaze direction. We quantified lateral stepping regulation from a goal equivalent manifold framework. Our guiding hypothesis was that stepping arises from continuous decision-making action-perception processes: each step taken affects the decision of where to step next. This generated three testable predictions. First, that contextual salience alone (merely "seeing" the path) is sufficient for people to regulate stepping. However, while substantial between-path differences largely supported this, within-path differences in both head angle and stepping demonstrated that visual information (perceptual salience) also informs stepping. Second, we predicted perceptual salience of task-relevant visual information (here, of the path itself) is sufficient to guide stepping. However, while changing path color contrast did elicit more and greater changes than manipulating environmental richness, path visual saliency alone was not sufficient. Third, we predicted perceptual salience from peripheral vision also contributes to stepping. This prediction was supported, though less strongly than manipulating path visual saliency or contextual salience (straight vs. winding paths). Thus, both contextual and perceptual salience interact to influence step-to-step control of walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.