ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Actigraphy Meets AI: A Digital Biomarker for Parkinson's Disease and Isolated REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) is an early stage of alpha-synucleinopathies, such as Parkinson's disease (PD). Actigraphy is a promising tool for assessing rest-activity patterns, however its diagnostic or predictive value in these disorders is understudied. This study evaluated AI-based models applied to actigraphy data to improve the detection of PD and RBD, additionally exploring their capability to capture early neurodegenerative patterns in isolated RBD. We trained and evaluated machine learning models with extracted actigraphy features, a convolutional neural network and a pre-trained transformer model-PAT-on two classification tasks: (1) distinguishing patients with PD from non-neurodegenerative controls and (2) distinguishing patients with PD and RBD (PD-RBD) from those without (PD-noRBD). We tested the best-performing model on patients with isolated RBD. PD-RBD showed significantly altered actigraphy features compared to PD-noRBD and controls. In PD versus control classification, the PAT model performed best (AUC = 0.937, sensitivity = 80.5%, specificity = 92.9%) followed by the neural network (AUC = 0.863) and machine learning (AUC = 0.840). In the PD-RBD versus PD-noRBD classification task, the PAT model again outperformed the other models (AUC = 0.956, sensitivity = 84.4% and specificity = 92.9%). For both tasks, the scores of isolated RBD patients fell between those of the comparison groups. AI-based actigraphy models can distinguish PD patients from controls and identify subtypes with high sensitivity and specificity. This shows their potential as non-invasive, scalable diagnostic tools and their relevance for identifying prodromal motor features, with future applications in predicting isolated RBD progression to PD. Validation in longitudinal cohorts remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.