ArticleInternal medicine journal2026
Australasian chronic lymphocytic leukaemia consensus statement: 2026 update.
Article in Internal medicine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2023, a consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) in Australasia was published. Since then, advances in clinical evidence and increased availability of molecular diagnostics and targeted therapies have further influenced contemporary CLL management. This paper provides an expert consensus update to the 2023 statement, offering current, regionally relevant guidance on the diagnosis, risk stratification and management of CLL, including treatment selection, sequencing of therapy, management of complications and supportive care. Recommendations were developed through a structured consensus process involving Australian and New Zealand clinicians with expertise in CLL and are endorsed by the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance, the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group CLL Working Party and the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were assigned using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.