ArticleJournal of vision2026
AI-generated faces are becoming more trustworthy.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human detection of AI-generated faces and voices is not domain-general.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has democratized access to high-quality image generation, creating both opportunities and risks. Research shows that generative adversarial networks (GANs) can generate faces that are nearly indistinguishable from and more trustworthy than real ones. However, the literature currently contains no direct comparison of the realism and trustworthiness of GAN-synthesized faces and faces produced by more recent models. Here we test whether faces generated by diffusion models (DMs), a new and more powerful GAI architecture, elicit trust and have similarly passed through the uncanny valley. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 169) saw 96 facial images and for each face indicated whether it was real or AI generated. In Experiment 2, participants (N = 87) again saw 96 facial images and this time were asked to rate how trustworthy each face appeared. We find that DMs produce less photo-realistic faces than GANs, but those faces are rated as more trustworthy than GANs and real faces. As the realism and availability of GAI continue to increase, it is now-more than ever-critical to understand this threat and develop strategies to mitigate potential harms to individuals, organizations, and democracies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.