Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42411876›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Comparing masking and habituation roles in saccadic omission of stimuli optimized for intra-saccadic vision.

Umberto Calleri, Antonella Pomè, Eckart Zimmermann

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Umberto CalleriInstitute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Antonella PomèInstitute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Eckart ZimmermannInstitute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements produce a rapid visual motion stimulation that remains unseen, a phenomenon known as saccadic omission. We have recently suggested that the sensorimotor system selectively habituates to, and thereby omits, the visual contingencies of saccades. In previous studies, a passive mechanism of saccadic omission was proposed in which the post-saccadic image serves as a backward mask to hide intra-saccadic motion from awareness. Here, we directly compared these theories using stimuli optimized for intra-saccadic vision: high-speed gratings that become visible only during the execution of saccades. In Experiment 1, we tested backward masking for three intra-saccadic motion stimuli (sudden-onset stationary grating, sudden-onset moving grating, and smooth-onset moving grating) by presenting a post-saccadic mask at saccade offset. Masking strongly reduced subjective motion report for sudden-onset stimuli but had little effect on smooth-onset motion, suggesting that gradual trans-saccadic transitions can bypass visual masking. In Experiment 2, repeated exposure reduced the detection of smooth-onset motion, but sudden-onset motion showed no reliable change. Thus, intra-saccadic habituation acts as an adaptive reduction in sensitivity to predictable motion associated with eye movements. Together, the results reveal complementary roles of masking and habituation in maintaining visual stability: Transient masking primarily impacts sudden intra-saccadic transients, whereas habituation tunes perception to predictable self-generated motion.

Indexed as

Habituation, PsychophysiologicMotion PerceptionPerceptual MaskingSaccadesAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42411876
PMCPMC13361912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.