Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42411850›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Optimizing Clinical Study Designs for CAR-T Cell Therapy: Development of an Efficient Sampling Strategy Through Optimal Experimental Design.

Fenja Klima, Anna M Mc Laughlin, Robin Michelet, Wilhelm Huisinga, Katy Haussmann, Annette Künkele, Andrew C Hooker, Charlotte Kloft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fenja KlimaFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8504-9788
Anna M Mc LaughlinFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5936-1877
Robin MicheletFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5485-607X
Wilhelm HuisingaGraduate Research Training Program PharMetrX, Berlin, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5249-3914
Katy HaussmannBerlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Annette KünkeleBerlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8406-5412
Andrew C HookerDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2676-5912
Charlotte KloftFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9344-8514

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CAR-T cell therapy is a cellular cancer immunotherapy that has impressively improved outcomes in hematological malignancies compared to conventional treatments. Yet, many patients do not respond permanently. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling can support a better understanding of the unique and not fully understood dose-exposure and exposure-response relationships for CAR-T cell therapy by integrating available knowledge into a quantitative, physiology-motivated framework. However, to unfold its full potential, it requires informative and efficient study designs for clinical data collection. We aimed to develop an optimal experimental design framework informing a robust and feasible clinical CAR-T cell study design based on a published mechanistic model of CAR-T cell kinetics and tumor dynamics. By considering variability between study populations and parameter uncertainty, we (1) identified the minimal population size required to inform model parameters, (2) assessed different sampling strategies, and (3) informed flexible sampling windows instead of fixed sampling timepoints. The optimized study design consisted of 60 patients, three fixed assessments of tumor burden (days 0, 30 and 90), and three feasible CAR-T cell sampling windows (days 2-4, 12-18 and 32-47 after infusion). In stochastic simulation and estimation, the optimized design with sampling windows showed better performance in informing model parameters, including those characterizing heterogeneous outcomes, than designs with fixed sampling timepoints, confirming its efficiency and robustness. This framework shall facilitate future feasible and resource-efficient CAR-T cell clinical data collection, thus showcasing the potential of optimal experimental design to advance the development and optimization of complex cancer immunotherapies in clinical trials and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsResearch DesignHumansReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesReceptors, Chimeric Antigencancer immunotherapyCAR‐T cellscellular therapyclinical study designmodelingoptimal experimental designsimulation

Identifiers

PMID42411850
PMCPMC13580764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.