Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42411741›Full record

ArticleHLA2026

Impact of Excluding Anti-HLA-C and -DP Antibodies From the Allocation System on Kidney Transplant Access.

Margot Lepage, Thomas Barba, Xavier Charmetant, Luc Chauvelot, Manon Guezennec, Kevin Goret-Roycourt, Fanny Buron, Olivier Thaunat, Emmanuel Morelon, Valérie Dubois and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HLA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Margot LepageNational Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, Décines-Charpieu, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2050-6572
Thomas BarbaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1281-0433
Xavier CharmetantCIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, Lyon, France.
Luc ChauvelotDepartment of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Manon GuezennecDepartment of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Kevin Goret-RoycourtDepartment of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Fanny BuronDepartment of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0404-6746
Olivier ThaunatCIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-8963
Emmanuel MorelonCIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, Lyon, France.
Valérie DuboisNational Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, Décines-Charpieu, France.
Alice KoenigCIRI, INSERM U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, CNRS UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ. Lyon, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the risk of antibody-mediated rejection, most kidney graft allocation systems define unacceptable antigens to prevent transplantation in the presence of donor-specific antibodies. Anti-HLA-C and anti-HLA-DP antibodies are often not included in these algorithms, including the French allocation system, despite growing evidence supporting their pathogenicity. In routine clinical practice, however, these antibodies are frequently considered by transplant teams when evaluating donor offers, creating a discrepancy between allocation scores and real-world access to transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the impact of this discrepancy on access to kidney transplantation. We conducted a retrospective study including 2160 patients registered on the kidney transplant waiting list at our centre between 2009 and 2018, in whom anti-HLA-C and anti-HLA-DP antibodies were systematically considered in clinical decision-making similarly to other HLA antibodies. Anti-HLA-C/DP antibodies were detected in 325 patients (15.1%). Incorporating these antibodies into cPRA calculations resulted in a near-systematic increase in cPRA values (mean increase, 5.5 ± 11.3). Using relative loss of graft access (RLGA), 83.5% of patients experienced reduced estimated access to transplantation, including 21.5% who lost more than 75% of their access. Patients harbouring anti-HLA-C/DP antibodies also exhibited significantly reduced access to kidney transplantation in both univariable and multivariable analyses (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42-0.66; p = 2 × 10

Indexed as

Graft RejectionHLA-DP AntigensIsoantibodiesKidney TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHistocompatibility TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTissue DonorsWaiting ListsHLA-DP AntigensIsoantibodiesanti‐HLA‐C antibodiesanti‐HLA‐DP antibodiesdonor specific antibodiesgraft accessgraft allocationkidney transplantationpanel reactive antibodyunacceptable antigens

Identifiers

PMID42411741
PMCPMC13339753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.