Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42411589›Full record

ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2026

Radiological Control After Reduction Mammoplasty: Do Ultrasonographic Postoperative Changes Return to Normal in the Late Period?

Nihal İşleyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nihal İşleyenDepartment of Plastic Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative ultrasonographic follow-ups of 65 breast reduction cases performed from 2012 to 2020 were evaluated. It was discussed whether the postoperative changes in the late period were permanent and how permanent cases affected breast cancer screening.

methodsSixty-five breast reduction cases performed in this clinic between 2012 and 2020 with at least 2 years of follow-ups were included in the study. Ultrasonography (USG) was administered to the patients before the operation and in the postoperative first month, sixth month, the first year, and every following year. While the patients under the age of 40 years were checked with USG only, mammography was also applied to the patients over the age of 40 together with USG during their controls.

resultsPostoperative secondary changes observed in the USG findings returned to normal in 84.7% of the patients, while they were permanent in 15.3% of patients.

conclusionUltrasonography is one of the most reliable methods in postoperative breast evaluation and breast cancer screening. Cite this article as: İşleyen N. Radiological control after reduction mammoplasty: do ultrasonographic postoperative changes return to normal in the late period? Eurasian J Med. 2026, 58(2), 1260, doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2026.251260.

Identifiers

PMID42411589
PMCPMC13178495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.