ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2026
Who Gets FIp? Understanding Contextual Factors in EIP Provision.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsFamily Intervention for psychosis (FIp) reduces the risk of relapse and improves functioning. However, implementation barriers exist. Being from racially and/or ethnically minoritised groups and experiencing contextual stressors may impact pathways to care and illness progression and prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the delivery of FIp in routine practice in a diverse and deprived inner-city borough. Patterns of engagement with family work and the relationship between ethnicity, social stressors and engagement were explored.
methodsSocio-demographic, service user data and verbatim information regarding family intervention in an Early Intervention service over a 12-month period were accessed via electronic patient records.
resultsAbout 48 (21.7%) out of 221 service users received family intervention over a year. Younger service users were more likely to receive FIp, and ethnicity and gender did not influence referrals. About 96% of service users and/or their carers were experiencing on-going social stressors, of which trauma was associated with a longer duration of treatment.
conclusionsService users and carers from diverse backgrounds in Early Intervention services who are experiencing high levels of stressors can engage in FIp. Further research to better understand ways to facilitate access and engagement for families with complex needs is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.