ArticleeLife2026
Optimised genome editing for precise DNA insertion and substitution using prime editors in zebrafish.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zebrafish relatives as models for functional comparative genetics and genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Catfish Transgenesis and Gene Editing: Overview, Recent Advances, and Future Perspectives.Biology · 2026Review
- Fin-ally together: the first UK zebrafish meeting.Biology open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing has rapidly become a popular tool for studying gene functions and generating genetically modified organisms. However, using this system, stochastic integration of random insertions and deletions restricts precise genome manipulation. Advanced CRISPR/Cas9 technologies using Prime Editors (PEs), Cas9 proteins fused with reverse transcriptase, enable programmed integration of short DNA modifications into the genome. However, its application in precise genome editing in animal models is challenging. Here, we utilise a nickase- and a nuclease-based PE to perform programmed short DNA substitutions and insertions at various loci in the zebrafish genome. Whereas nickase-based PE2 mediated a higher ratio of precise prime edits to the total edits, nuclease-based PEn was more efficient for short DNA modifications, achieving up to 27.3% precise insertion. To further evaluate our approach, we inserted a nuclear localisation signal into a reporter transgene to incorporate longer fragments by prime editing. These gene modifications were transmitted to the next generation. We show that PE-mediated prime editing can efficiently manipulate genome information in zebrafish without using exogenous donor DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.