Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42411395›Full record

ArticleNursing open2026

Factors Related to the Visiting Nurse Staff's Intention to Continue Working.

Tatsuhito Kamimoto, Sumie Ikezaki, Mami Onishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tatsuhito KamimotoGraduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3619-0504
Sumie IkezakiGraduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Mami OnishiFundamental Nursing, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to examine the factors related to the visiting nurse staff's intention to continue working and to obtain nursing management implications for their continued employment.

designA quantitative cross-sectional study.

methodsA nationwide self-administered survey was conducted among visiting nurses in Japan (July-October 2021) using a hybrid response mode (online and paper). Questionnaires were targeted for distribution to 2500 nurses: 2400 via visiting nurse stations selected through stratified random sampling across all prefectures and an additional ~100 via supplementary convenience/purposive recruitment to improve response rates. Intention to continue working was dichotomised (agree/strongly agree vs. disagree/strongly disagree), and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with intention to continue working.

resultsA total of 276 responses were received (response rate 11.0%). After excluding managers, 182 staff visiting nurses were analysed; 130 (71.4%) reported intention to continue working. Higher perceived managerial leadership was strongly associated with intention to continue working (OR = 11.70, 95% CI = 3.46-39.50), as was being married (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.07-6.21).

conclusionsManagerial leadership may be a key, modifiable organizational factor associated with visiting nurses' intention to continue working. Strengthening managerial leadership may contribute to the retention of visiting nurses. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement occurred in the design or conduct of this study.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmploymentIntentionJob SatisfactionNurses, Community HealthAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescross‐sectional studyintention to continue workingvisiting nurse

Identifiers

PMID42411395
PMCPMC13338836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.