Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42411245›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Noise Management Preferences During Long-Term Hearing Aid Usage and Their Relation to Audiologic Factors.

Marianna Vatti, Takanori Nishiyama, Daisuke Suzuki, Peter Ihly, Chiemi Tanaka, Sébastien Santurette, Johannes Zaar, Søren Laugesen, Gary Jones, Tsubasa Kitama and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marianna VattiCentre For Applied Audiology Research, Oticon A/S, Smørum, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2280-6051
Takanori NishiyamaGeneral Incorporated Association Shinden-Ogawa Audiology and Hearing Aid Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke SuzukiGeneral Incorporated Association Shinden-Ogawa Audiology and Hearing Aid Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.
Peter IhlyInstitute of Acoustics, Technische Hochschule Lübeck (University of Applied Sciences Lübeck), Lübeck, Germany.
Chiemi TanakaOticon Japan, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8390-8369
Sébastien SanturetteCentre For Applied Audiology Research, Oticon A/S, Smørum, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6868-5734
Johannes ZaarEriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7815-0864
Søren LaugesenInteracoustics Research Unit, Ørsteds Plads, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9531-9978
Gary JonesDemant, Smørum, Denmark.
Tsubasa KitamaGeneral Incorporated Association Shinden-Ogawa Audiology and Hearing Aid Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.
Jürgen TchorzInstitute of Acoustics, Technische Hochschule Lübeck (University of Applied Sciences Lübeck), Lübeck, Germany.
Kaoru OgawaGeneral Incorporated Association Shinden-Ogawa Audiology and Hearing Aid Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki OishiGeneral Incorporated Association Shinden-Ogawa Audiology and Hearing Aid Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.
Tim JürgensInstitute of Acoustics, Technische Hochschule Lübeck (University of Applied Sciences Lübeck), Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1481-6997
Seiichi ShindenGeneral Incorporated Association Shinden-Ogawa Audiology and Hearing Aid Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preferences for advanced hearing aid (HA) noise management features, such as directionality and noise reduction (DIR + NR), differ significantly among users. Due to the lack of standardized clinical guidelines for fine-tuning these features, audiologists often rely on individual user preferences. However, this approach doesn't always ensure optimal hearing outcomes. The goal of this study was to examine how users respond to these advanced features in everyday acoustic environments, with two main goals: to assess how sensitive users are to changes in DIR + NR settings compared to subtle gain adjustments, and to identify the factors influencing DIR + NR preferences in various situations. A total of 123 individuals using bilateral HAs participated in the study, conducted at two locations in Germany and Japan. Over six testing periods (half a year), participants were provided with two listening programs that differed either in the strength of their DIR + NR settings or in gain levels for high-frequency and soft sounds. Participants documented their preferences via self-initiated questionnaires, reporting experiences with the different settings in real-life listening scenarios. Most participants preferred modest adaptive DIR + NR settings and participants generally expressed higher preference strength for small gain changes than for variations in DIR + NR. Preferences could not be reliably predicted from audiologic or environmental factors, apart from a minor influence of subjective noisiness. These findings suggest that clinicians can guide the initial fitting of DIR + NR settings to optimize speech-in-noise performance, as adaptive DIR + NR configurations are broadly acceptable. User preferences remain important, particularly during gain fine-tuning, as small adjustments can be noticeable.

Indexed as

Correction of Hearing ImpairmentHearing AidsHearing Loss, BilateralNoisePatient PreferencePersons with Hearing DisabilitiesAcoustic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overAuditory AcuityAuditory ThresholdFemaleGermanyHumansJapanMaleACTbrightness and soft gaindeep neural networksdirectionalityecological momentary assessmentfield preferenceshearing aidsnoise reduction

Identifiers

PMID42411245
PMCPMC13342364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.