ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2026
Preliminary Report of a Nationwide Prospective Cohort of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Korea.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) cases are identified prenatally, enabling early multidisciplinary interventions, including maternal transfer and preparation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). These strategies may improve the historically stagnant survival rates in Korea. However, multicenter studies on the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of CDH are lacking. This study introduces the Korean CDH cohort (K-CDH), a nationwide prospective registry, and presents interim findings.
methodsThe cohort comprises data from 6 tertiary centers (4 in Seoul and 2 in other regions), all equipped with experienced neonatologists, pediatric surgeons, and ECMO support. Collected data include prenatal characteristics, postnatal management, surgical interventions, and follow-up outcomes. The primary outcome measured was survival to neonatal intensive care unit discharge. Risk factors for mortality or ECMO requirement were also analyzed.
resultsSixty newborns with CDH were enrolled between March 2023 and December 2024. Non-isolated CDH was identified in 16 cases (27%), including three with confirmed genetic syndromes. Sixteen infants (27%) required ECMO, with a mortality rate of 44% among them. In univariate analysis, mortality or ECMO requirement were associated with lower APGAR scores, liver herniation, lower observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratio, and initial PaCO₂, oxygenation index, alveolar-arterial oxygen difference and early severe pulmonary hypertension (PH). Multivariable analysis identified initial PaCO₂ and early severe PH as independent predictors of mortality or ECMO requirement. Among the 57 infants who underwent surgical repair (95%), most had left-sided Bochdalek hernias (n = 47), followed by right-sided (n = 7) and Morgagni-type (n = 3). The median time to surgery of 4 days and 23 (40.4%) required patch repair. Overall, 53% of patients (n = 32) received at least one medication for PH (25 received inhaled nitric oxide and 22 received milrinone). Seven infants were discharged on oral pulmonary vasodilators. The overall survival rate was 85%.
conclusionThe interim analysis of the K-CDH cohort demonstrates improved infant survival rates exceeding international benchmarks and confirm that the initial PaCO₂ and severe PH, consistent with previous studies, are predictors of mortality or ECMO. These findings underscore the importance of standardized perinatal care, early risk stratification, and coordinated efforts across multiple centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.