ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2026
Improving Delirium Prediction in Surgery: Enhanced Machine Learning Models vs. Traditional Risk Scores.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative delirium (POD) is a prevalent complication among older surgical patients; however, accurately predicting its occurrence using traditional point-based risk scores remains challenging. This study aimed to develop a delirium prediction model using a contemporary dataset and to compare the performance of modern machine learning (ML) algorithms with that of the Inouye and Marcantonio risk indices.
methodsA retrospective cohort of 283 surgical patients aged ≥ 50 years (POD incidence = 8.8%) was analyzed. Candidate predictors included demographic characteristics, frailty markers, comorbidities, surgical category, and planned intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Class imbalance was addressed using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Five classifiers-ridge logistic regression (baseline), random forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and a stacking ensemblewere trained using 5-fold stratified cross-validation. Model discrimination, assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), along with F1 score, precision, and recall, was averaged across folds. For comparison, the Inouye 4-factor and Marcantonio 7-factor scoring systems were recalculated for each patient.
resultsThe mean patient age was 65.7 ± 8.6 years, and 40.6% were female. The incidence of POD varied significantly across surgical specialties, ranging from 18.4% in hepatobiliary procedures to 3.7% in general and vascular surgeries. Univariate analysis identified older age, functional dependency, planned ICU admission, and high-risk surgery as significant risk factors. The AUCs of the ML models ranged from 0.57 (logistic regression) to 0.78 (stacking ensemble). Among individual models, CatBoost achieved the best overall balance (AUC = 0.77). In contrast, traditional risk scores demonstrated poor performance (Inouye AUC ≈ 0.50; Marcantonio ≈ 0.56).
conclusionContemporary ML models outperformed conventional delirium risk scores in predicting POD, although their overall discrimination remained moderate. Key predictors included age, frailty markers, and surgical complexity. Integration of ML-based screening into electronic health records may enable earlier identification of high-risk patients and facilitate targeted delirium prevention strategies. External validation in larger, multi-center cohorts is warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.