ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
"When the climate changes, we feel it first": Gendered perceptions of environmental change and women's health in Pakistan.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundRural women in climate-vulnerable regions face intersecting health risks from environmental stressors, gendered labor roles, and limited access to health services. Understanding how men and women perceive climate change is critical for designing interventions that protect women's health and well-being.ObjectivesTo examine gendered perspectives on climate change among smallholder farmers in rural Pakistan and explore how these perspectives influence health-related risks and adaptive capacity, with a focus on implications for women's health.DesignThis study employed a cross-sectional Q-methodology design to identify shared and divergent viewpoints within and between male and female participant groups.MethodsThirty participants (10 women and 20 men) from South Punjab, Pakistan, provided written informed consent. They sorted 48 statements into a forced quasi-normal distribution from "most disagree" to "most agree." These individual sorts were analyzed, through PCA and varimax rotation, for identifying shared perspectives ('Factors' in Q terminology) separately for men and women. The qualitative interpretation of the factors was based on most (dis-) agreed upon, distinguishing and consensus statements.ResultsWomen's factors, such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.